It was alleged that these entities indulged in anti- competitive practices in the digital cinema exhibition market.
The complaint was filed against US-based Digital Cinema Initiatives (DCI), Limited Liability Company (LLC), which is a joint venture, and its six stakeholder partners — The Walt Disney Company India, Fox Star Studios, NBC Universal Media Distribution Services, Sony Pictures, Warner Bros and Paramount Films India.
Allegations made by K Sera Sera was first rejected by the Commission in April 2015, following which the complainant approached the Competition Appellate Tribunal.
The tribunal then asked the regulator to reconsider the matter and also examine potential of technical rules in creating anti-competitive conditions and establishing monopolistic conditions.
After looking at the matter again, the regulator has rejected the complaint saying there is no case of competition norms violation.
It was alleged that Digital Cinema has been formed with an object to dominate and monopolise the market of digital cinema exhibition in India and elsewhere.
"Nothing is stated in the information or submitted by the informant which can disclose there exists an agreement amongst opposite parties which can be considered as anti-competitive in terms of Section 3(4) of the Act. The information also does not disclose any case of abuse of dominant position by any of the opposite parties in terms of Section 4 of the Act," the order, dated June 8, said.
Section 3 of Competition Act relates to cartelisation while Section 4 pertains to abuse of dominance.
With regard to alleged collective abuse of dominance by the opposite parties, CCI said, "Since there are no provisions for collective dominance under the Act, the matter need not be assessed on this aspect".
Among others, it was alleged that DCI, LLC is a cartel through which the opposite parties are deciding the price of movie hall tickets by forcing the cinema owners to install expensive DCI-compliant servers and projectors.
The theatre owners are deprived from exhibiting Hollywood movies because of the possession of non-DCI compliant equipment and such restrictions crush the relatively small and technologically independent players in the market, it was alleged.
"Only approximately 5% of the total revenue earned by the Indian film industry were derived from Hollywood movies implying that the informant would not be adversely affected if it is not able to screen the movies of opposite parties," CCI said in its order.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)