Competition watchdog dismisses complaint against vacation exchange firm RCI

RCI India is a subsidiary of RCI Inc and looks after the business of timeshare exchange in India

cci, competition commission of india
The complaint stated that RCI Europe had executed an agreement with Luxembourg-based Covington S.A.R.L., a subsidiary of Mahindra.
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Oct 31 2019 | 8:57 PM IST

The Competition Commission has dismissed a complaint of alleged anti-competitive practices against global vacation exchange firm RCI India for entering into a pact with subsidiary of Mahindra Holidays and Resorts, saying the agreement does not have any impact on the competition in the Indian markets.

RCI India is a subsidiary of RCI Inc and looks after the business of timeshare exchange in India.

A timeshare is a model in which customers own a right to use certain properties owned by timeshare companies for a fixed duration every year for a certain number of years, subject to availability, according to an order by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The order comes following a complaint filed by former director of RCI India who alleged that RCI through various agreements has been making illegal transactions with its clients including Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India Ltd.

The complaint stated that RCI Europe had executed an agreement with Luxembourg-based Covington S.A.R.L., a subsidiary of Mahindra.

According to the agreement, RCI Europe would provide interest free loan of 10 million euros to Mahindra (India) which was to be used by Covington for buying Holiday Club Resorts OY.

It has been alleged that the loan transaction creates barriers to competition for its rival in the timeshare exchange market.

While disposing of the case, the regulator noted "the acquisition, alleged to be anti-competitive, has taken place outside India and is in the context of a product meant for consumption outside India... Though Mahindra (India) seems to be the ultimate acquirer of the Holiday Club, the present case does not seem to have any impact on the competition in the Indian markets."

Further, the CCI said, "Acquisition of Holiday Club does not appear to bring any material change in the position of Mahindra (India) as a competitor in the Indian markets. Thus, the present case does not appear to raise any competition concern in India, to warrant scrutiny under the Act.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Competition Commission of India

First Published: Oct 31 2019 | 7:20 PM IST

Next Story