The submissions were made before a single judge bench of Justice V P Vaish by the Delhi government which claimed that due consultative process between the Centre and the Chief Minister as mandated in the NDMC Act, was not followed in the appointment of BJP leader Karan Singh Tanwar.
"Not a single meeting was held and no opportunity was given to Chief Minister by the Centre to discuss the merit and demerit of candidate for NDMC Vice Chairman," senior advocate Dayan Krishnan appearing for Delhi government said.
"It was an unilateral appointment. Why were they (Centre) shying away from deliberations? Why did they did not held a single meeting? Were some facts hidden," Krishnan asked.
He said that the Centre is the final authority to issue notification but due process of consultation needs to be followed.
"No one is doing a favour by consulting us. It is the mandate of statute, which needs to be followed," he said.
"The notification of centre suffered from serious irregularities as there was no consultation between the chief minister and the Centre," he said.
He sought quashing of appointment of Tanwar as Vice Chairman and said that Singh was a member of the Council and he has a right to be considered for the post of VC in NDMC.
The bench after hearing the parties posted the matter for further hearing on September 9.
On August 7, the Centre had defended its decision to appoint Tanwar as VC of NDMC, saying power to nominate a person for this post fully vests with it and they have followed all due procedures.
