The Centre told a bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta that it had nothing to do with the sealing as it was for the municipal agencies in Delhi to look into it.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) A N S Nadkrani, representing the Centre, told the bench that entire documents of the case was not available and they would file an affidavit after looking into all the details.
"I have a draft but I have to see all the documents. I do not want to file a sketchy affidavit," Nadkarni said, adding, "We have nothing to do with the sealing. We are concerned with the law. Sealing is for the municipal agencies to look into".
To this, the bench observed, "According to Union of India, the Supreme Court is responsible for the delay".
The bench, while
asking the Centre to file a reply in three weeks, posted the matter for hearing on April 2.
"The ASG says that he will collect the papers from the amicus and file an affidavit justifying the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006 within a period of three weeks from today. We make it clear that no further time will be granted," the bench noted in its order.
The bench would deal with the issue of validity of the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006 and subsequent legislations.
The apex court had earlier said that the authorities do not appear to have carried out their statutory duties in preventing illegal construction in Delhi.
The apex court had also ordered restoration of its 2006 monitoring committee to identify and seal such offending structures.
The monitoring committee, comprising K J Rao, former advisor to the Election Commissioner, Bhure Lal, Chairman, EPCA and Major General (Retd) Som Jhingan, was set up in March 24, 2006, by the apex court.
The court had earlier said it had asked the committee not to seal any premises from 2012, expecting the authorities to carry out their statutory duties.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
