Children being used as tools of vengeance: Delhi HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 17 2017 | 8:58 PM IST
In today's life, innocent children are being used as tools of vengeance in vindictive lawsuit filed by estranged couples, the Delhi High Court has said.
The high court also observed that the number of divorce cases across all sections of the society was increasing, resulting in the rise of bitter child custody battles.
"Often the innocent children are used as tools of vengeance by vindictive litigants. A perusal of Article 39 (e) & (f) of the Constitution of India would guide that of the various fundamental rights of a child, one valuable right is to get love and affection from both parents, right to quality of life, right to be cared and the right to develop a sense of belonging," a bench of Justices Pradeep Nandrajog and Yogesh Khanna observed.
The bench said that the primary considerations to find out the best interest of the child would be, ensuring benefit to the child of having to spend significant time with parents to develop a meaningful relationship.
"When there are grandparents, uncles, aunties, cousins etc., overnight access should be there so that the child gets love and affection from the extended family," it said, adding that parents should also "ensure" and "protect" the child from "psychological harm".
The court observed this on a plea by a man who has moved the high court seeking visitation rights and interim custody of his daughter, who was staying with her mother.
The man was denied visitation right after he got married to another woman.
The couple, who got married in 1997, obtained divorce by mutual consent in 2010.
Allowing the visitation rights to the man, the court in the instant case noted that the girl child, who lived with her father for three years, turned not only cold but positively hostile towards the father within six months of the custody being with the mother.
Directing the child to be sent for counselling, the court observed, "Regretfully, the judge of the family court has not pondered to find the reason for this sudden behavioural change in the child. Has the mother poisoned the mind of the child? An attempt ought to have been made to unravel the truth.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 17 2017 | 8:58 PM IST

Next Story