A bench headed by Justice M B Lokur declined to make the report public but handed over a copy to Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi for his perusal on condition of maintaining its confidentiality.
The copy of the report was given to the Attorney General as the bench, also comprising Justices Kurian Joseph and A K Sikri, wanted his assistance after the panel headed by former CBI Special Director M L Sharma sought apex court's direction for supply of documents relating to preliminary enquiry into some of the matters in which the probe was closed.
The bench said the after the submissions are made on the report by Rohatgi, it will see whether the copy of the report of the panel can be given to other parties or not.
"We have to first see the submissions. Then we will decide whether the report can be given to the parties or not," the bench said.
Rohatgi opposed giving the report to other parties, saying "PEs (preliminary enquiry) registered by CBI were examined by CVC. There is no point that the report be given to other parties."
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for petitioner NGO Common Cause, said once the probe is over, charge sheet or closure report has been filed, there is no reason why the report be not given to him.
"We have to see whether the report is to be disclosed or not, whether its finding is to be disclosed or not," the bench said while posting the matter for further hearing on May 4.
The bench also took on record the status report filed by
On December 7 last year, the apex court had ordered handing over of original visitors' diary of the official residence of ex-CBI director to Sharma led panel.
The court had on May 14 last year, admonished Sinha for his "completely inappropriate" meetings with coal scam accused in the absence of investigating officers (IOs), saying that "further inquiry is necessary" to ascertain the fairness and impact of his conduct in the coalgate probe.
Ordering the probe, the bench had then said that there cannot at all be any justification for Sinha to meet any accused in a criminal case where "investigation is underway, without the investigating officer being present".
The bench then appointed a panel headed by Sharma who later sought the visitors' diary for proceeding with the probe.
As the visitors' diary was sealed by an order of a bench, hearing 2G cases, the three-judge bench, which hears the coal scam matters, said it would be appropriate that the CJI-headed bench decides whether the Sharma panel can be given the sealed diary or not. The CJI referred back the matter to the bench, which ordered handing over the diary to the panel.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
