ComMin to meet tyre cos to discuss anti dumping duty on Mar 28

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 19 2017 | 12:28 PM IST
Taking forward the probe for possible imposition of anti dumping duty on imports of a certain kind of radial tyres, the Commerce Ministry has called a meeting of the domestic players on March 28.
Automotive Tyre Manufacturers' Association (ATMA) had filed the application on behalf of the domestic producers -- Apollo Tyres, J K Tyre Industries and Ceat Ltd for the investigations in dumping of the tyres.
The other major manufacturers of radial tyres in India include MRF and Goodyear.
The Directorate General of Anti dumping and Allied Duties (DGAD), in its investigation, has found sufficient prima facie evidence of dumping of the tyres by Chinese companies.
The probe was on the dumping of 'new/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having nominal rim diameter code above 16' used in buses, lorries and trucks.
Demanding anti-dumping duty on the product, industry expert said that the truck and bus radial tyre installed capacity in India has gone up, while production by domestic manufacturers has come down as compared to last year.
"The market size has expanded but almost the entire growth has been absorbed by the increasing Chinese imports at predatory prices," ATMA Chairman Satish Sharma told PTI.
He said this is very de-motivating for the domestic manufacturing and puts returns on investments made at risk.
"The other fallout will be the slowdown of future investments in the category. We look forward to the government for a favourable conclusion via slapping of anti-dumping duties on the Chinese imports," he added.
Countries initiate anti-dumping probes to determine if the domestic industry has been hurt by a surge in below-cost imports. As a counter-measure, they impose duties under the multi-lateral WTO regime.
Anti-dumping measures are taken to ensure fair trade and provide a level-playing field to the domestic industry. They are not a measure to restrict imports or cause an unjustified increase in cost of products.
Unlike the safeguard duty, which is levied in a uniform way, anti-dumping duty varies from company to company and country to country.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 19 2017 | 12:28 PM IST

Next Story