Committees to decide protection to whistle-blowers: Govt to HC

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Mar 05 2013 | 2:00 PM IST
The Maharashtra government has decided to form committees at various levels to scrutinise applications of whistle-blowers who seek police protection in wake of threats received by them from anti-social elements.
The committees would be set up at different levels -- state and district-wise -- Assistant Government Pleader Nitin Deshpande informed the Bombay High Court which yesterday heard a suo motu (on its own) petition concerning safety of social workers and whistle blowers.
If a whistle-blower apprehends or receives threat to his life from some quarters, he or she may approach the committee functioning in his district and seek protection. However, the committee would scrutinise his application and may or may not recommend interim police protection to him.
After a whistle-blower gets interim protection, his case would be referred to the state-level committee, which would decide whether to continue the protection or not, the court was informed.
The state committee may even decide to discontinue the protection granted earlier and in such case the concerned whistle-blower would not be asked to pay fine or compensation for the protection given to him, the government pleader said.
In case of crimes committed against a whistle-blower or a social worker, cases would be registered in the concerned police station. In rural areas, the probe would be conducted by a policeman not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and in urban areas by an officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police.
The investigations in such cases would be monitored by the respective committees.
The committees would meet periodically and also review the cases where protection had been already granted to the whistle-blowers. In other words, it would decide whether protection should continue or not, the court was told.
After the murder of Satish Shetty, a social worker and RTI activist of Pune, the High Court had taken up a suo moto petition on protection to be granted to whistle-blowers. Shetty had blown a whistle on a series of land scams in and around Talegaon, Lonavala and Pune.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 05 2013 | 2:00 PM IST

Next Story