CCI dismisses complaint against DLF

The complaint was filed by three individuals who had booked one residential flat in each of the two residential projects

CCI dismisses complaint against DLF
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 06 2016 | 8:25 PM IST
Fair trade regulator CCI has rejected a complaint of anti-competitive practices against DLF pertaining to 1995-96 period saying competition regulations were not place at that time.

While dismissing the allegations, Competition Commission of India (CCI) also said the informants have approached it "only as an after thought" since their petitions were rejected by the Supreme Court.

The allegations were made against DLF Universal with regard to its projects in Gurgaon, Haryana.

Also Read

It was alleged that DLF Universal, a subsidiary of DLF Ltd, abused its dominant market position and failed to deliver apartments booked by informants in two residential projects.

The complaint was filed by three individuals who had booked one residential flat in each of the two residential projects.

Among others, it was alleged that the company demanded unjustified amounts towards holding charges, imposed hidden costs and onerous conditions through the agreements.

The Commission noted that the cases pertain to the period 1995-1996 and any alleged abuse of dominance by DLF Universal were made at a time when the Section 4 of the Competition Act was yet to be enacted.

"... The Commission is of the view that, if the Commission were to make an assessment of dominance or alleged abusive conditions imposed by OP (DLF) in the present cases, such assessment would essentially relate to a time when either the (Competition) Act itself was not enacted or Section 4 of the Act was not in force," the watchdog said in an order dated December 5.

Section 4 relates to abuse of dominant position.

According to CCI, the informants had moved the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum in 2003, contested the appeal in National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission and also moved Special Leave Petitions in the Supreme Court previously for seeking redressal of the grievances.

"... It is thus, clear that the informants have approached the Commission only as an afterthought after their petitions were dismissed by the Supreme Court," it added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 06 2016 | 8:20 PM IST

Next Story