Complete probe against builders in 90 days, HC tells police

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 29 2016 | 12:48 PM IST
The Bombay High Court has directed the Mumbai Police Commissioner to evolve a mechanism to ensure that investigation of offences, particularly pertaining to complaints against builders and developers, should get over within 90 days as stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code.
A division bench of the High Courtheaded by Justice V M Kanade alsodirected the Police Commissioner to call for explanation from the investigation officer in cases where the chargesheet is not filed within the stipulated 90 days.
"An explanation should be called from the investigation
officer as to why the investigation is not completed within a reasonable period of time and why chargesheet had not been filed in the stipulated period," said the bench.
The Judges also opined that if the explanation in this regard is not found to be satisfactory,then adverseremarks shouldbemadeinConfidentialRecordsofsuchofficers.
The High Court was hearing a petition filed by a city developer and other respondents seeking to quash a complaint filed by a resident of a building who was promised a flat after its reconstruction but was sold to another person.
"In the present case, we are informed by the instructing
officers that hand writing expert's opinion was not obtained in time and, therefore, the chargesheet was not filed."
The bench expressed that this explanation is not satisfactory and opined that directions should be issued to the Police Commissioner to make an enquiry in this case.
However, it refrained from passing any orders because it
did want the complainant and her husband to be harassed further and also because if such investigation is made again, they may have to run from pillar to post and visit the office of Police Chief.
"On this ground alone, we do not propose to give such directions," the Judges said in a recent order.
One of the petitioners and builder Rajendra Jain, who was present in the court, voluntarily agreed to donate an amount of Rs one lakh to Tata Cancer Research Institute of Mumbai.
The court accepted his offer but directed that the amount
should not be paid in currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 denomination as these have been forfeited by the government in the recent demonetisation move.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 29 2016 | 12:48 PM IST

Next Story