Concealment of criminal record by NSUI candidate serious: HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 20 2017 | 6:22 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today termed as "very serious" the alleged concealment of criminal record by NSUI presidential candidate who won the recent Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) election.
The court was informed about the alleged concealment and suppression of facts from the authorities by Rocky Tuseed, who was elected as DUSU President, by opponent ABVP candidate Rajat Chaudhary.
"It is very serious. It is concealment," Justice Indermeet Kaur said while issuing notice to Tuseed and Delhi University on an impleadment application filed by Chaudhary.
The application was filed in a pending petition by Tuseed in which he has challenged the Delhi University (DU) Election Commission's order rejecting his nomination for the polls on the grounds of disciplinary action.
The court sought Tuseed's and the unversity's responses on the plea and listed the matter for November 15.
Chaudhary said as per the guidelines of the Lyngdoh committee, the candidate shall not have a previous criminal record, nor tried or convicted of any criminal offence and shall not have been subject to any disciplinary action by the university authorities.
The plea claimed that Tuseed has not disclosed to DU authorities that an FIR was lodged against him in 2014 at Rajouri Garden Police Station in West Delhi for the alleged offences of causing hurt, attempt to murder, trespass and common intention and that he had remained in judicial custody from August 28, 2014 to September 15, 2014. A charge sheet was also filed in the case.
The RSS-backed ABVP candidate, in his plea filed through advocates Jivesh Tiwari and Suman Chauhan, said there was "deliberate suppression and misrepresentation of facts and narration of false facts by the petitioner (Tuseed) in the proceedings".
They sought to recall the court's September 8 and September 12 interim orders by which Tuseed was allowed to contest the polls and DU was allowed to announce the result.
"Various illegal and unlawful practices were adopted by the petitioner (Tuseed) to win the elections by hook or crook and it has ultimately caused irreparable loss and injury to the applicant (Chaudhary)," the plea alleged.
The high court had in an interim order on September 8 allowed Tuseed to contest the DUSU elections while setting aside the September 7 order of DU Chief Election Officer.
It had also modified its earlier order and allowed DU to declare the election result on September 13.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 20 2017 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story