Attacking the then Manmohan Singh government, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said it had given licences in 2007-08 on the basis of a price linked to 2001 and there was a "huge element of arbitrariness" in the implementation of the policy.
His colleague Prakash Javadekar alleged that the "choregraphed" charge sheet by the previous UPA government resulted in acquittal of the accused.
"The Congress choreographed it," he said. To make his point, he cited a case in which the then law minister Ashwani Kumar had to resign after he was accused of interfering with a CBI report in coal block allocation probe.
Javadekar likened the case to a murder case, saying somebody has been killed but guilty has to be found. In a similar way, corruption had happened and the trial court verdict deal with the guilt of the accused.
Each allocation was quashed as arbitrary and unfair, he said, adding that the criminal case was launched on the Supreme Court's order, he said.
Jaitley also rejected former telecom minister Kapil Sibal's "zero loss" claim in the allocation, saying it was disproved by the subsequent allocation by the BJP-led NDA government fetching Rs 1.10 lakh crore in 2015 and Rs 66,000 crore in 2016.
Sibal fired a fresh salvo at the BJP following the trial court order today, saying his stand has been vindicated.
Cut-off dates were advanced and the first come first served policy was intended to serve a select few, he said, adding that it was later changed to "first come first pay" and a select few were informed in advance.
It was proved by the fact that they had got bank drafts prepared on back dates, he said.
Javadekar referred to the money received by the NDA government for allocation of the 2G spectrum and said it was almost equal to Rs 1.76 lakh crore, which former CAG Vinod Rai had said was the loss to the exchequer caused by the UPA policy.
"It is no clean chit to the Congress," he said.
The Congress was keeping mum on coal block allocation cases in which many accused had been convicted, he said.
Had the UPA policy been clean, then the court would have revived the cancelled licences, he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
