The Congress must reverse Donald Trump's "atrocious" travel ban on people from several Muslim-majority countries, a top Indian-American attorney has demanded, after the US Supreme Court narrowly upheld the President's immigration policy.
Neal Katyal, one of the principal litigators against Trump's controversial travel ban, said the policy was "unconstitutional, unprecedented, unnecessary and un-American".
Katyal, former deputy solicitor general in the Obama administration and the primary architect of arguments against President Trump's travel ban, called for hope and congressional action in the face of the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling along party lines, yesterday.
Trump had announced his first travel ban aimed at seven countries, just a week after he took office in January 2017, triggering a global uproar.
The travel ban had restricted the entry of people from Iran, North Korea, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Venezuela. Chad was originally on the list but it was recently removed after having met baseline security requirements.
President Trump today lauded the ruling "a tremendous victory for the American People and the Constitution" and said he felt vindicated.
But Katyal said: "In this case, it was not the decision but the process that defines America and that gives me hope."
He said the travel ban is an "atrocious policy, and makes us less safe and undermines our American ideals. Now that the Court has upheld it, it is up to Congress to do its job and reverse [the] travel ban."
Human rights organisation Amnesty International said the ban, and the anti-Muslim sentiment in which it originated, has "no place in a country that claims to value human rights."
The American Civil Liberties Union also condemned the court's ruling, saying that "this is not the first time the Court has been wrong, or has allowed official racism and xenophobia to continue rather than standing up to it."
Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, said in a statement that the court's "ruling will go down in history as one of the Supreme Court's great failures."
Democratic National Committee chair Tom Perez said, "Discrimination is not a national security strategy, and prejudice is not patriotism. Let's call this ban for what it is: an outright attack on the Muslim community that violates our nation's commitment to liberty and justice for all."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
