Coronavirus: HC grants interim bail to retired BSF officer in case under SC/ST Act

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 25 2020 | 2:42 PM IST

A retired BSF officer, who feared of being vulnerable to coronavirus in jail due to his age and existing ailments, has been granted interim bail for 45 days by the Delhi High Court in a case of allegedly making casteist remarks to a neighbour over a property dispute.

Justice Brijesh Sethi, who conducted the hearing through video-conferencing, granted the relief to the 65-year-old man on furnishing a personal bond of Rs 15,000.

"Considering the above facts and circumstances of this case and in the interest of justice, while exercising the inherent powers under section 482, CrPC, the petitioner is granted interim bail for a period of 45 days. He be released on bail forthwith on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs 15,000 to the satisfaction of the jail superintendent/duty metropolitan magistrate, if not required in any other case," the court said.

The man was accused in a case lodged at the Najafgarh police station for offences under the provisions of SC/ST Act and criminal trespass and criminal intimidation under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The casteist remarks were allegedly made during a fight over an ongoing property dispute between the neighbours.

Advocates M K Ghosh and Tina Garg, representing the senior citizen, sought the relief on the ground that the dispute between the parties was civil in nature and the allegations against the petitioner were false. They said earlier in 2006, similar allegations were levelled against the petitioner.

The lawyers for the petitioner said their client was 65 years of age and suffering from hypertension, and he be released on interim bail in view of the COVID-19 pandemic as it was difficult to maintain social distancing in jail.

The prosecutor opposed the bail plea.

The judge noted in his order that the accused and the complainant were neighbours and the court finds that an earnest effort can be made by the parties to settle the dispute. The lawyers for the parties told the court that they were agreeable to the suggestion.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 25 2020 | 2:42 PM IST

Next Story