Couple gets jail in minor's sexual assault, kidnapping case

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 11 2017 | 5:48 PM IST
A man has been sent to seven years in jail for sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl for two months by a city court, which also held his wife guilty of kidnapping the minor.
Additional Sessions Judge Gautam Manan awarded jail term to Uttar Pradesh resident Kamal saying he does not deserve any leniency in view of the nature of offence committed by him.
The court also sentenced his wife Sonu to two-year imprisonment which she has already undergone in jail during trial, after taking a lenient view considering she was the only person to take care of their three minor children.
It also directed that a compensation of Rs three lakh be paid to the victim and asked Delhi Legal Services Authority to ensure compliance of its order.
"Concept of welfare and well-being of children is basic for any civilised society and this has a direct bearing on the state of health and well-being of the entire community, its growth and development.
"It has been time and again emphasised in legislation, international declarations as well as the judicial pronouncements that children are a 'supremely important national asset' and the future well-being of the nation depends on how its children grow and develop," the court said.
According to the prosecution, a complaint was lodged by the girl's father in November 2012 that his daughter was missing and had not returned from school.
During investigation, it was found that their neighbours, Kamal and Sonu were also missing. The victim was rescued in January 2013 from them.
The girl deposed in the court that she knew the couple as they were neighbours who had shifted to some other place. She said the woman had come to her school to take her along. While her behaviour initially with her was cordial but later Kamal started sexually assaulting her, before she was rescued by the police.
During trial, the accused couple claimed that the girl had come to their house and stayed with them voluntarily. They alleged that the girl had told them that her mother was not treating her well but later made a false statement under pressure from her parents.
The court rejected their submission saying that the girl was of tender age which makes her consent to go with them immaterial and they cannot keep the child with them without the permission of her parents.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 11 2017 | 5:48 PM IST

Next Story