Court accepts LG appointed SPP, not one by AAP govt

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 07 2015 | 8:22 PM IST
Delhi government today got a jolt from a court here which turned down its notification appointing a special public prosecutor (SPP) in the Rs 100- crore transport scam case, observing that the LG-appointed SPP would conduct proceedings in the matter.
The court dismissed an application filed by advocate B S Joon who said that being appointed by the AAP government, he was entitled to conduct prosecution of the case in which Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) had filed charge sheet last week.
His plea for supply of documents was not accepted by the court, which approved the appointment of lawyer Sanjay Kumar Gupta by Lt Governor Najeeb Jung to conduct the prosecution.
"The application filed by B S Joon is dismissed in view of Article 239AA of the Constitution (special provisions with respect to Delhi)," Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry said while pronouncing the order.
The ACB had on September 3 filed its charge sheet in the court naming nine persons, including two IAS officers, as accused in the case. The court has fixed September 26 for consideration on the charge sheet.
During the hearing, the respective SPPs appointed by the Delhi government and the LG were at loggerheads with both trying to convince the court that their appointment was valid.
Advancing his arguments, Joon said the prosecutor in any case is always appointed by the State government and not any other authority and the notification in this regard is issued by the Department of Home of the State.
Joon said a notification has been issued by the Delhi government appointing him as the SPP in the case and nothing has been issued in favour of Gupta. He also cited Supreme Court judgements in support of his arguments.
He added that ACB was part of vigilance department of Delhi government which is competent to appoint SPP here.
His arguments were opposed by Gupta who cited Article 239AA of the Constitution and said Delhi is not a complete state but a union territory where LG has the power to appoint SPP in a case.
He said Police Station ACB is in direct control of LG and as his orders have been passed by LG, he is the competent person to be appointed as SPP in this case.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 07 2015 | 8:22 PM IST

Next Story