Judge Ntendeya Mavundla of the Pretoria High Court yesterday dismissed with costs an application by 20 companies linked to the Guptas seeking to stop the Bank of Baroda (BoB) from closing all its accounts and leaving South Africa.
The Indian state-owned bank announced last month that it had decided to close down operations in South Africa in line with a revision of its global strategy.
Also Read
The three brothers, as well as Duduzane Zuma, son of former president Jacob Zuma who was forced to resign last month, are being sought by authorities investigating these allegations, but the whereabouts of all four are unknown.
Mavundla said in his judgement that the courts could not interfere with BoB's decision to leave the country.
"The respondent's rights to trade or not to trade supersedes whatever right if any the applicants might have. I further conclude that the balance of convenience far outweighs that of the applicant's and tilts in favour of (BoB)," Mavundla said.
"Put differently, the courts cannot compel the respondent to keep the doors of its business open for whatever duration," the judge added.
The applicants had secured an interim order against BoB late last year after the bank had advised that it would be closing all accounts of Gupta-linked companies.
The companies cited difficulties they would have with the closure of paying salaries to thousands of their employees in their businesses ranging from information technology to mining.
But the latest judgement said that BoB had "every right" to terminate business contracts including those of the 20 Gupta-linked companies.
There were no immediate comments from the Gupta companies and Bank of Baroda on the ruling by the court.
The Gupta family, who arrived in South Africa from their hometown of Saharanpur in UP about two decades ago, has established a massive business empire in diverse fields, allegedly through their closeness to ex-president Zuma.
The eldest brother, Ajay, has been declared a fugitive by authorities after he failed to hand himself over to investigators as agreed.
Last week, Home Affairs Minister Malusi Gigaba announced on national television that Ajay Gupta had not acquired South African citizenship because he had refused to renounce his Indian citizenship first.
Gigaba also came under fire for initially declaring that Atul Gupta did not have South African citizenship either, but later withdrew this after the media published a copy of Atul's South African identity document.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)