The court gave the relief to Bhangoo and another official of his Group, Tarlochan Singh on the ground of parity as some other co-accused in the case have already been granted bail.
"Accused number 2 (Tarlochan) has appeared pursuant to summons issued by this court. Co-accused number 4,5 and 7 have already been granted bail. The role of present accused are almost similar to the other accused.
During the arguments, Bhangoo's counsel Vijay Aggarwal said his client was entitled to the concession of bail as the co-accused have already been granted bail and his role was similar to the other accused.
The bail plea was opposed by SEBI's counsel Sanjay Mann who contended that complaint was filed regarding non-bailable offences and there was no parity in the accused persons' role.
Bhangoo, however, would remain in jail as his counsel has not given bail bond as he is in custody in the CBI case for alleged offences of criminal conspiracy and cheating under the IPC against him and others in connection with alleged swindling of Rs 45,000 crore from over five crore investors.
The court had earlier summoned as accused Pearl Agrotech Corporation Ltd (PACL), its promoters and directors, Nirmal Singh Bhangoo, Tarlochan Singh, Sukhdev Singh, Gurmeet Singh, Subrata Bhattacharya, Joginder Tyger, Gurnam Singh, Anand Gurwant Singh and Devinder Kumar Uppal on SEBI's complaint.
saying prima facie violation under the provisions of SEBI Act and regulations of SEBI (CIS) Regulations, SEBI(Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) is made out in the alleged ponzi case.
According to the regulator's complaint filed in the court in November 2015, PACL had allegedly illegally mobilised Rs 49,100 crore and SEBI had directed it to refund the money to over five crore investors.
The firm challenged SEBI's recovery proceedings to collect funds due to investors before Securities Appellate Tribunal, the complaint said.
It claimed that the firm, which had assets worth only Rs 11,000 crore, had allegedly siphoned of a huge amount of money which was untraceable. SEBI had also imposed a penalty of over Rs 7,269 crore on the firm and its directors, it said.
In its FIR, CBI has claimed PACL and PGF were running the schemes illegally and both companies were allegedly engaged in fraudulent activities including forgery in their day-to-day operations.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
