Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav pulled up the Delhi Police for "not showing any sensitivity towards the plight of the child" and deliberately delaying recording the statement of the 13-year-old girl before a magistrate.
The court refused to accept the cancellation report filed by the police, summoned the accused lawyer after taking cognisance of the offences and framed charges of sexual assault, sexual harassment and threatening his daughter under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and IPC.
"For the reasons best known to the investigating officer (IO) the statement of the child under section 164 CrPC was delayed for about six days. It appears that during those six days the accused could win over the child. Neither the IO, nor concerned SHO or ACP have shown the sensitivity towards the plight of the victim in the cancellation report filed in the matter," the court said.
The girl had told the police that in July 2016, her mother away at her relative's place and she was living in her house along with her father and siblings.
She alleged that her father had sexually harassed her by asking for sexual favours and established physical relations with her for several days. She had said her father had sexually assaulted her and used criminal force by twisting her arm with an intention to outrage her modesty.
The police in its cancellation report said in view of the girl's statement to the magistrate, no cognizable offence was made out against the man.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
