Special Judge Bhupesh Kumar modified the jail term of the 20-year-old youth to the period already undergone by him behind bars for the offence of theft under section 379 of IPC.
"The appellant (convict) is in custody since July 17, 2015 for committing the theft of a mobile phone. As per record, the appellant was 19 years old at the time of his arrest.
"Considering his age, it is found that the company of other jail mates may affect the psychology of the appellant and he may become a hardcore criminal and the chances of reforming the appellant may fade away," the judge said.
"...It is found that the sentence the appellant has already undergone since July 17, 2015 has been found to be more than sufficient to meet the ends of justice for the offence committed... The impugned order on sentence is modified...To undergo the period of conviction he has already undergone," the judge said.
However, when the youth tried to run away, the gate of the bus closed and he was apprehended, it said, adding that an FIR was lodged and he was taken into custody.
In December 2015, the magisterial court convicted him and sentenced him to jail.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
