CrPC provision to recall witness not to plug loopholes: Court

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 27 2017 | 7:13 PM IST
The provision of recalling witnesses under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) cannot be used for plugging loopholes in a case, a Delhi court has said while rejecting a plea to re-examine the alleged victim by the man accused of molesting her.
The court made the observation while dismissing the plea of the man, accused of molesting and threatening a woman in 2014, seeking her recall on the ground that during cross- examination, his counsel did not ask her about the previous enmity between her husband and him.
The court, while rejecting his plea, also noted that there was a delay in filing the application to seek recalling of the complainant and that her cross-examination was already complete.
"In view of the contents of the cross?examination of the complainant and delay in filing the application under section 311 of CrPC, the court does not find any ground to allow the revision petition for recalling the complainant for further cross-examination.
"The provision under section 311 of CrPC cannot be used for plugging the loopholes, if any," Additional Sessions Judge Vrinda Kumari said.
The court also rejected his submission that due to change in counsel, his petition be allowed.
"Change of counsel cannot be a ground to invoke provision of section 311 of CrPC where the previous counsel has already cross?examined the witness," it said.
Challenging a February 15 order of a magisterial court rejecting his plea for re-examination of the woman, the accused claimed that there was a property dispute between him and the complainant's husband which gave rise to this molestation complaint.
The woman was not asked about this dispute by his counsel during cross-examination, he claimed while seeking a?last and final?opportunity?to?cross-examine the complainant.
The court, however, said the cross?examination of the complainant "makes it amply clear that counsel for the accused had put suggestions to the complainant that would show a pre- existing dispute between the parties".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 27 2017 | 7:13 PM IST

Next Story