Delhi Assembly Speaker "biased" against me: BJP MLA to HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 24 2016 | 7:57 PM IST
BJP MLA O P Sharma, who has been suspended from Delhi assembly for two sessions for allegedly making derogatory remarks against AAP legislator Alka Lamba, today claimed before Delhi High Court that the approach of the Assembly Speaker was "biased" against him.
Sharma's counsel alleged before Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva that the Ethics Committee, which dealt with this matter, never considered the explanation given by him which clearly showed the extent of bias against his client.
"The explanation as to why the said utterances were made by O P Sharma was never considered by the Ethics Committee. The statements made by Sharma was a spontaneous reaction to the verbal provocation by Alka Lamba," his counsel said.
"Verbal provocation by Lamba was never recorded as part of the assembly proceedings but only the reaction of Sharma was recorded," the lawyer said, adding "the Speaker's approach in dealing with the matter was biased".
During the hearing, the bench asked Sharma's counsel, "You are saying that proceedings of the Legislative Assembly were thoroughly biased but these proceedings cannot be questioned here. You still have to address on the issue of judicial intervention".
The arguments on the plea filed by Sharma, who has challenged his suspension, today remained inconclusive and would continue on August 30.
Sharma had yesterday claimed before the court that democratic functioning had been "stonewalled" in the assembly and due to the majority enjoyed by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).
There was "bias and illegality" in the way he was suspended from the assembly and prescribed procedures were not followed, he had alleged.
The Delhi government had earlier alleged that the BJP MLA in the past too had engaged in "immoral, violent and appalling behaviour", while opposing the maintainability of Sharma's plea challenging his suspension.
Referring to a report of an Ethics Committee of the Delhi assembly, the government had said that Sharma was given chances to express regret on his remarks but had refused.
The Ethics Committee had earlier "unanimously" recommended stripping Sharma of his assembly membership for his remarks against Lamba and being "unrepentant" about it.
Sharma had earlier said "my intention was not to hurt Lamba as she is like my sister, but if she felt offended I express regret over it".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 24 2016 | 7:57 PM IST

Next Story