Sharma's counsel alleged before Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva that the Ethics Committee, which dealt with this matter, never considered the explanation given by him which clearly showed the extent of bias against his client.
"The explanation as to why the said utterances were made by O P Sharma was never considered by the Ethics Committee. The statements made by Sharma was a spontaneous reaction to the verbal provocation by Alka Lamba," his counsel said.
During the hearing, the bench asked Sharma's counsel, "You are saying that proceedings of the Legislative Assembly were thoroughly biased but these proceedings cannot be questioned here. You still have to address on the issue of judicial intervention".
The arguments on the plea filed by Sharma, who has challenged his suspension, today remained inconclusive and would continue on August 30.
Sharma had yesterday claimed before the court that democratic functioning had been "stonewalled" in the assembly and due to the majority enjoyed by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).
The Delhi government had earlier alleged that the BJP MLA in the past too had engaged in "immoral, violent and appalling behaviour", while opposing the maintainability of Sharma's plea challenging his suspension.
Referring to a report of an Ethics Committee of the Delhi assembly, the government had said that Sharma was given chances to express regret on his remarks but had refused.
The Ethics Committee had earlier "unanimously" recommended stripping Sharma of his assembly membership for his remarks against Lamba and being "unrepentant" about it.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
