"Any demand of money, property or valuable security made from the bride or her parents or other relatives by husband would fall within the mischief of 'dowry'," said the division bench of Chief Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and Justice J B Pardiwala.
"Formerly dowry was defined as property given as the consideration for the marriage but the words 'as consideration for the marriage' have been omitted and substituted by the words 'in connection with the marriage now," the court said.
Jamanagar-based Kamlesh Tanna and his mother had challenged a 2001 order of a sessions court sentencing them to seven years' imprisonment in a dowry death case.
Kamlesh married Sandhya in 1997. After the marriage, she was asked to bring Rs two lakh from her parents so that he could start a business.
She was harassed and eventually committed suicide in 2001. The couple had had two children by then.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
