The petition, filed by DMK organising secretary R S Bharathi, submitted that the state government by its January 8 order, had replaced V K Jayakodi with Mohan Pyare.
Bharathi submitted that his earlier petition was not only against the person, but also against the method of appointment and the selection process adopted by the government and the governor's secretariat.
Bharathi submitted that the state government in the recent past has been nominating the chief secretary or officers in the rank of additional chief secretary as state vigilance commissioner.
"The effect of such a nomination is that the entire State Vigilance Commission has lost its character as an independent, objective and transparent autonomous body and has become a wing of the state government, thereby defeating the very purpose of its constitution," he said.
The person selected must be an independent officer appointed specially to the post with a secured tenure as done in the case of CBI Director or Central Vigilance Commission.
Senior Counsel P Wilson, representing Bharathi, submitted that government's move in appointing Jayakodi as commissioner of the Vigilance Commission was "arbitrary, illegal and unreasonable" as he was a junior in rank to several officers, including the chief secretary.
His interim prayer was to stay its operation.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
