Don't create hurdles to interfaith marriages, HC tells Haryana officials

Image
Press Trust of India Chandigarh
Last Updated : Jul 26 2018 | 9:35 PM IST

The high court here has asked Haryana government officials not to create hurdles to interfaith marriages, saying some of the information sought under the state's rules violated privacy.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court's order was on a petition against a checklist' framed by the state government, one of whose provisions required informing a couple's parents about the planned marriage.

The court has suggested that the state government should modify and simplify its court marriage check list (CMCL) to ensure minimal executive interference.

The court said the procedure must reflect the mindset of the changed times in a secular nation instead of the officialdom raising eyebrows and laying snares and landmines beneath the sacrosanct feet of the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

In his July 20 order, Justice Rajiv Narain Raina said the Haryana checklist for the registration of marriages should be brought in line with the Act, "avoiding unwarranted overload of obstructions and superfluity.

A Hindu woman and a Muslim man had sought directions from the court to the Gurugram district marriage officer to not send notices of the intended marriage to their parents.

The couple also wanted the court to stop the officer from publishing anything on the marriage in a national newspaper, as demanded under the checklist.

The notices to the parents impinged on their right to privacy, the couple argued.

The woman's petition said she faces virulent opposition to the proposed marriage from her parents.

The counsel for the petitioners had argued that the CMCL directives are highly offensive, insensitive, arbitrary, primitive and out of sync with the rapidly changing social order.

Referring to the condition that the couple should not be staying at one place, the counsel said it amounted to moral policing "in a country where live-in relationships are judicially recognized by courts as precious rights among informed adults, whether or not they intend to marry, so long as they do not violate any law."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 26 2018 | 9:35 PM IST

Next Story