'Extorting money in guise of police without causing injury

Image
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : Jul 07 2015 | 11:07 PM IST
: Holding that extorting money from a person in the guise of a policeman without injuring him also amounts to robbery and those accused in the case would come under the ambit of robbery by means of extortion, Madras High Court bench today confirmed the conviction of a lower court sentencing three persons to seven years Rigorous Imprisonment.
Justice S Nagamuthu confirmed the conviction of the trio, who robbed two men of Rs five lakh on February 13 1999 in Soolkarai when they were carrying a precious stone for sale.
The judge said there was no need for an identification parade now and that made in court for the first time was enough in this case.
The three 'policemen' had come in a van, asked Rajeswaran to leave his car and accompany them to the police station, saying they had 'information' about them carrying funds for terror outfit Al Umma. Later they took away the money.
After some distance, they had asked Rajeshwaran, with whom the buyer Udayakumar had sent the money, to go get his car.
Rajendran, the other person in the car, claimed that Rajeshwaran was one of the conspirators and had planned the robbery in advance.
The court said since the buyer had been cheated there was no motive for him to implicate them in the case.
The judge was hearing the appeal of three of the accused, including P Rajendran, Kumar and Rajendran.
Rajendran said his namesake had cheated Udhayakumar, an estate owner in megamalai in theni district, by making him believe that the precious stone was genuine.
Udhayakumar had negotiated and agreed to buy the stone for Rs five lakh and had sent the money through Rajeswaran and Rajendran.
Rajendran conspired with others and asked them to pose as police at Ettinayakan Patti and check their vehicle even as he was travelling with Rajeswaran.
The accused were sentenced by the trial court on Dec 27 2994 to seven years RI and also slapped with a Rs 5000 fine.
Kumar submitted his wife was physically challenged, he had a child and sought to reduce the sentence and offered to pay a fine of Rs 25,000.
Rajendran said he was now a pastor and sought to reduce the sentence and opted to pay more fine.
P Rajendran, the fifth accused, said he had already undergone 11 months imprisonment, was a labourer and had to take care of two children.
The judge reduced their sentence to three years RI and also asked them to pay a fine of Rs 25000.
He directed police to take the appellants into custody and produce them before the addtional district judge,Virudhunagar, who would commit them to prison with appropriate warrant.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 07 2015 | 11:07 PM IST

Next Story