Putting forth a strong argument against the "various unsubstantiated assertions" that the USTR has levied against India's IP Regime, the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) in its submission said that India's first National IPR Policy has been welcomed by all stakeholders.
It said the initiative by India has been widely acknowledged worldwide as a commendable proactive vision which has endeavoured to synergies Intellectual Property with Indias various policy initiatives.
India, the FICCI said has been putting serious efforts into modernising the countrys IPR ecosystem, to make it conducive to innovation, creativity and towards promoting IP commercialisation.
In its submission FICCI noted that despite the extensive developments taking place in the countrys IP regime, India continues to be viewed as IP non-compliant by the US.
One reason for this could be the differing views of the two trading partners on the approach to IPR protection, it said.
With each passing year, the foundation of the Indian IP regime is gaining momentum and strengthening itself for an innovation and technology driven economy, it argued.
An assessment by the FICCI of the Indian legal framework and practices for IP enforcement vis-a-vis '25 Best IPR Enforcement Practices' revealed that India is largely compliant with international standards provided under the TRIPS agreement, though there is considerable scope improvement in IP enforcement, it said.
"This will be important to maintain and indeed further enhance the positive spirit of the ongoing bilateral dialogue between India and US," it said.
"The need to sort out the IPR issues between India and the US is crucial for bilateral trade relations to flourish further," the FICCI said.
Though India recognises the need for a policy aligned with global standards, it cannot accept discriminatory and unfair imputations, nor act in disregard of its overriding national interests.
Improving on the IPR irritants is an aspirational goal, but must be consistent with Indias priorities, the FICCI asserted.
The Special 301 Report is prepared annually by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) which identifies trade barriers to US companies and products due to the intellectual property laws, such as copyright, patents and trademarks, in other countries.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
