A bill in this regard was today approved by the Swiss Federal Council, the top-most policy making body of the Switzerland government, and it would be discussed in Parliament after a public consultation process.
The proposal assumes significance for India because it is probing hundreds of its citizens for suspected hoarding of alleged black money in Swiss banks and their names are part of a much longer list of account holders in HSBC's Geneva branch which was 'stolen' by a former bank employee.
The list later found its way to the French government, which shared the relevant names with its Indian counterpart.
As domestic laws in Switzerland do not allow 'mutual assistance' to the requests based on stolen data, the Swiss authorities have been refusing to share details with India about these account holders despite a bilateral treaty being in place between the two countries.
However, Switzerland has agreed to share details if India is able to provide 'independent evidence' about these persons and through this route Indian tax department has been able to get details in some cases.
The proposed change in the law would make it much easier for India to get the required information about those suspected to have stashed black money in HSBC's Geneva branch, as the information has been received through its "normal administrative assistance channel" with France.
Announcing its today's decision, the Federal Council said it has initiated the consultation proceedings on the revision of the Tax Administrative Assistance Act, which provides for an easing of Swiss practices with regard to stolen data.
"It should now be possible to respond to requests if a foreign country has obtained the stolen data via normal administrative assistance channels or from public sources.
"However, administrative assistance is still not possible if a country has actively acquired the stolen data outside of administrative assistance proceedings.
"The proposed legislative amendment will clarify the legal situation while also taking account of international developments," it said.
The Federal Council had previously also proposed easing administrative assistance practices in the case of stolen data in 2013 with the first revision of the Tax Administrative Assistance Act.
However, the majority of the cantons, parties and business associations rejected the proposal in the consultation on that occasion.
Since then, international practice has established that exceptions to the exchange of information will be tolerated only on a very restricted basis.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)