Firm says decision to ban e-cigarettes 'discriminatory', challenges it in Calcutta HC

Image
Press Trust of India Kolkata
Last Updated : Sep 26 2019 | 8:00 PM IST

A city-based electronic cigarette wholesale company on Thursday moved the Calcutta High Court challenging the Centre's decision to ban such alternative smoking devices, terming it is arbitrary, discriminatory, excessive and drastic.

Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi claimed before Justice Arindam Sinha that the ban violates fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14 (Equality before law), 19 (Protection of rights) and 21 (Protection of life and personal liberty) of the Constitution.

He submitted that the government's decision to ban production, import, export, transport, sale or advertisements of alternative smoking devices was discriminatory since these are less harmful while sale and advertisements of combustible tobacco products like cigarettes, cheroots and bidis, which are far more harmful to health, continue with certain restrictions.

While advertisements of these products are banned, these cannot be sold near schools or to minors.

E-cigarettes have a negligible quantity of carcinogen, whereas combustible tobacco products have a much higher carcinogenic material, he submitted.

Singhvi sought an interim order by the court, stopping any ban by the government on the alternative smoking device till disposal of the petition.

He claimed that e-cigarettes actually help smokers give up smoking cigarettes, by switching to this less harmful product.

Justice Sinha adjourned hearing in the matter till Monday, when the counsel for another e-cigarette wholesale company will make submissions challenging the government's decision.

The lawyer for the central government will make submissions against the prayer for an interim order by the first petitioner on Tuesday, Justice Sinha directed.

The government had on September 18 decided to ban e-cigarettes for which an ordinance was cleared making the production, import, export, transport, sale or advertisements of such "alternative" smoking devices a cognisable offence attracting jail term and fine.

First-time violators will face a jail term of up to one year and a fine of Rs 1 lakh. For subsequent offences, a jail term of up to three years or a fine of Rs 5 lakh, or both have been prescribed, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who headed a Group of Ministers (GoM) on the issue, had announced.

Storage of e-cigarettes shall also be punishable with imprisonment up to six months or fine of up to Rs 50,000 or both.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 26 2019 | 8:00 PM IST

Next Story