The study on the status of implementation of the Act in the national capital has claimed that ration shops routinely remain closed during working hours, dealers overcharge and supply foodgrains below prescribed limits, often of poor quality, while the city government looks the other way.
The study, undertaken by the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan and Satark Nagrik Sangathan over 2016-17, focused on 221 shops (approximately 10 per cent of the total ration shops in Delhi) located across eight districts.
Since the legislation was enforced, more than 19 lakh ration cards have been issued in Delhi, which has around 2,257 fair price shops.
In many shops, it was found that the information on the scale of entitlement and price was outdated and related to categories of ration cards which have been discontinued since the implementation of the NFSA, which essentially means consumers were being overcharged and deprived of enhanced benefits, the study claims.
Families under the Antodaya category are entitled to 35 kg subsidised foodgrains per family per month while those identified as priority households are entitled to 5 kg, including rice and wheat at Rs 3 and Rs 2 per kg respectively.
Most often shopkeepers indulge in corruption by overcharging or undersupplying for each category of ration card, the report said.
Other key findings of the report include the fact that only six per cent of the surveyed shops were found displaying details of their stock received during the month while only 16 per cent displayed the daily opening and closing of stock of each foodgrain, in violation of laid down norms.
This assumes importance as often ration is denied to cardholders on the pretext that the government has not supplied the requisite stock of foodgrains to the shop, the study, anchored by academics Anjali Bhardwaj, Amrita Johri and Dipa Sinha among others, observed.
Johri, who is associated with the Satark Nagrik Sangathan, said the situation is such that none of the 221 shops audited displayed information regarding the designation of ADMs as DGROs and their contact details.
The Supreme Court had on July 21 observed that the Act has not been implemented properly, and it is a "pity" that a legislation enacted by Parliament for citizens' benefit was kept on the "back-burner" by various states.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
