Four contractors were also booked under various sections of the IPC on the complaint lodged against them by Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) at Sadar police station, the official said.
The two FIRs were registered against the officials and the contractors under sections 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) and 120B (punishment of criminal conspiracy) of the IPC, the official said.
Also Read
The official said the Irrigation department officials and contractors allegedly entered into a conspiracy in the soil work and construction of the 35-km-long canal and cheated the state government of Rs 1549.99 lakh.
These officials are identified as Prabhakar Morghade, Shyam Ambulkar, Dilip Pahekar, Sopan Suryavanshi and Rahidas Landge who were working at VIDC in various capacities for the Gosikhurd Project, he said, adding that they misused their official positions to help contractors B V Ramarao and Ramareddy G N Reddy.
Another set of VIDC officials includes then Executive Engineer Ramesh Vardhane, Divisional Accountant (retd) Gurudas Mandavkar, Superintendent Engineer Sopan Suryavanshi (who took a voluntary retirement), and Chief Engineer and executive director (retd) Devendra Shirke, the official said.
He said these officials were responsible for alleged corruption in the soil work in the construction of the 4500 metre-long main canal near Ghodajari branch.
The official said that contractors Shyam Dharmadhikari and Sunil Shinde entered into a conspiracy with these officials and cheated the exchequer to the tune of Rs 781.39 lakh.
Further investigation is on, he added.
Gosikhurd is the inter-district irrigation project in Vidarbha which was approved in March 1983 at an estimated cost of Rs 372.22 crore and was expected to be completed by March 1990. However, it remains incomplete even after 33 years after the approvals were granted.
It is alleged that the project costs have escalated manifold over a period of time.
The ACB had last September filed a chargesheet against six former officials in a Nagpur court for alleged fraud and corruption in the inter-district irrigation project.
A report of the Public Accounts Committee had noted that after 33 long years and spending thousands of crores, the purpose of commissioning the project is not realised yet.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
