The government contended that Justice P R Ramachandra Menon, while admitting a batch of 85 odd petitions challenging its July 31 order sanctioning Plus Two schools and additional batches, had granted main relief itself without issuing notice to parties and without hearing them.
The appeal also claimed that since admissions to Plus Two courses were already underway and academic year had commenced, any interference at this stage would jeopardise the admission process.
The court had found that the evaluation for sanctioning of schools was not on the basis of merit.
Meanwhile, the single judge withdrew the notice issued to cabinet sub-committee while delivering the interim order.
Muslim Education Society and others had approached the court stating that the Plus Two courses were not sanctioned based on the educational need and on the basis of recommendations of an expert committee.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
