Govt rejects Congress conditions for supporting GST

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 14 2015 | 7:22 PM IST
Government today rejected the conditions put up by Congress for supporting the long-delayed GST legislation, with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley saying these are "after-thought" and were not part of the bill that the party had itself introduced.
"I do not think it is very part of prudent politics for any party to put pre-conditions, particularly on a matter which involves a fiscal relationship between the Centre and the states," Jaitley told reporters here.
He was replying to a question about the three pre-conditions put forth by former Finance Minister P Chidambaram for Congress party to support GST.
Indirect tax reform GST proposes to create an uniform tax rate across the country by subsuming excise, service tax and other local levies. GST is estimated to boost India's GDP by 1-2 per cent. The Government had proposed to introduce the new regime from April 1, 2016.
Due to disruptions by Congress, the government could not get the GST Constitution Amendment Bill passed in the Monsoon session of Parliament which ended yesterday.
The government is also keeping its options open on calling a special session of Parliament to get the long-delayed GST bill passed.
Addressing press conferences in different parts of the country to 'expose' Congress party, senior union ministers including Piyush Goyal, Nirmala Sitharaman and Prakash Javadekar also put the blame on the main opposition party for the delay in getting this key reform bill passed.
The ministers also maintained that the government is 'optimistic' about meeting the rollout target for the uniform nationwide tax regime from April next.
Talking about the pre-conditions put forth by Congress, Jaitley said the first condition of a constitutional cap of 18 per cent on GST rate was not Chidambaram's proposal in the Bill as approved by him after the Standing Committee recommendation in 2013.
"Nor the then Finance Minister's (Pranab Mukherjee's) proposal, when he introduced the bill in 2011 had any 18 per cent cap. So that is clearly an after-thought," he said.
Jaitley said the rates would be decided as per the fiscal position and economic situation, and Constitution need not be amended for that.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 14 2015 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story