Guj govt delayed action on bird flu due to summit: HC petition

Image
Press Trust of India Ahmedabad
Last Updated : Feb 07 2017 | 10:28 PM IST
A petitioner, who challenged the Gujarat government's handling of bird flu case in Ahmedabad, today told the Gujarat High Court that action was delayed by several days due to the Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit.
Petitioner Kiran Shah, in an affidavit filed before the division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi, told the court that the state government was aware that the bird flu case was positive as early as January 4.
He said that the government undertook culling and other measures to prevent its outbreak as late as January 13 because it was busy preparing for the Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit.
Shah referred to a letter issued by the Centre's department of animal husbandry, dairy and fisheries on January 4 directing the state government to take preventive measures in view of positive bird flu case.
The letter asked the state government's department of animal husbandry to declare 10 km area around the place as affected zone and also increase surveillance and provide it with day-to-day report.
The state government had in its affidavit filed before the court earlier said that it came to know about the report of the Bhopal laboratory saying that the bird flu case was positive only on January 11, and undertook measures like culling after that.
Petitioner Shah in his counter affidavit alleged that the state government deliberately suppressed the report, and said the government's affidavit is false.
The High Court is hearing a set a two PILs related to the detection of bird flu among birds kept at an animal rescue centre in the thickly populated Memnagar area of the city. The matter will come up for hearing next on Thursday.
In it's earlier affidavit, the state government had claimed that swift action was taken by the administration to tackle bird flu.
In their PILs, petitioners Bhagwatiben Brahmbhatt and Shah have contended that authorities have not followed any guidelines and tried to hide their failure by doing culling operation during the night of January 13.
The petitioners also sought identification of persons responsible for bringing affected birds in the locality and action against them by way of penalty for causing hardship to local residents.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 07 2017 | 10:28 PM IST

Next Story