Public Prosecutor Mitesh Amin, who began his argument against Hardik's bail plea in the court of Justice A J Desai, told the court that "conduct and behaviour" of accused Hardik since the beginning of the agitation was against the government and seditious in nature.
The court kept the matter for further hearing post summer vacation, on June 9 as the government lawyer said that he cannot finish his arguments in a day. The High Court will go for vacation from coming Saturday.
Amin highlighted Hardik's behaviour as 'stubborn' for insisting that Chief Minister Anandiben Patel herself should come to collect memorandum at GMDC ground where a huge rally turned violent on August 25 last year.
Hardik's insistence led to his detention, he told the court. The violence that broke out following his detention could have incurred loss to the tune of around Rs 100 crore, Amin told the court.
He further said that Hardik made several statements to incite public during the India-South Africa match in Rajkot on October 18, where he himself went. Amin also told the court that the HC had set aside quashing a petition filed by the accused in two FIRs lodged in Surat and Ahmedabad.
Amin further argued that while the ordinance was open
to be challenged legally after the court asked how the government was going to adjust reservation within 50 per cent cap as determined by the Supreme Court, the government's intention was positive.
He had approached the high court for bail, after the lower courts in Surat and Ahmedabad (where there are separate sedition cases against Hardik) refused him bail.
The young Patel leader and his three associates are facing charges under IPC sections 124(A) (sedition), 121 (A) (conspiracy to wage war against government) and 120 (B) (criminal conspiracy) here. They are accused of inciting violence to put pressure on the government to accept the demand of OBC reservation for Patels.
Hardik is lodged at Lajpore jail in Surat.
