Guj HC seeks reply from Centre, RBI on DCCB note exchange ban

Image
Press Trust of India Ahmedabad
Last Updated : Nov 29 2016 | 6:43 PM IST
The Gujarat High Court today sought replies from the Centre and RBI on a petition challenging the legality of their notifications banning district central co-operative banks (DCCBs) from exchanging defunct notes and disbursing short-term loans to farmers.
A division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi today asked the government pleader to seek instructions from the two defendants and posted the matter for further hearing on December 5.
The petitioners, Bhavnagar District Co-operative Bank (BDCB) and its chairman Nanubhai Vanani, also sought quashing of the notification dated November 8 declaring demonetisation of currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000.
It said RBI notification barring DBBCs from exchanging defunct currency notes and restricting account holders, mainly farmers, from withdrawing cash beyond Rs 10,000 was "without any authority of law."
Restriction on dispensing short-term loans to farmers has broken their line of finance for raising crops because of which "farmers would be ruined and they would not be able to purchase their seeds, fertilisers, pesticides etc," it said, claiming that DCCBs should be treated at par with any other banks as per the RBI guidelines.
Petitioner's lawyer B M Mangukiya also told the court that a close look at sub-section (2) of section 26 of the RBI Act shows that only a certain number of notes of certain series can be demonetised in one go and not the entire stock.
BDCB currently has about 2,55,000 account holders and caters to 825 villages of Bhavnagar, Amreli and Botad districts, with 625 primary cooperative societies dispensing agricultural credits through the bank, it said.
The court, in an oral direction, asked RBI and government counsel to ensure there was enough cash in all banks by December 5 to help people withdraw their salaries.
"The action of the respondents is ex-facie illegal, arbitrary and ultravires in view of the fact that no power has been conferred on the Centre under the provisions of RBI Act. The said actions are illegal, arbitrary, ultravires and violative of articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India," the petitioner's lawyer said.
The petitioner has also sought high court's direction to RBI to accept Rs 113 crore in demonetised notes lying in the bank's chest and replace it immediately with new bills.
Farmers in Gujarat are protesting the RBI ban on DCCBs exchanging or depositing demonetised notes.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 29 2016 | 6:43 PM IST

Next Story