Gujarat panel on "snoopgate" lacks jurisdiction: Website

Image
Press Trust of India Ahmedabad
Last Updated : Jan 16 2014 | 12:25 AM IST
The Gujarat Government-appointed judicial commission probing the alleged surveillance of a woman by police is an attempt to shield the state administration and functionaries and has no jurisdiction to inquire into the matter given the inter-state nature of the case, according to an affidavit filed before the panel today.
In an affidavit filed before the commission, journalist Ashish Khetan, head of investigative portal Gulail.Com, said, "The terms of reference clearly points towards an attempt to shield the state government and its functionaries from grave charges of violation of the privacy of a young woman as well as of perverting the facilities and forces available to the state government for the completely unlawful purpose of stalking a women."
The affidavit said, "Given the inter-state nature of the alleged illegal surveillance (by Gujarat Police), this Commission does not have jurisdiction to inquire into the matter."
Gulail.Com was one of the two investigative websites which exposed the scandal late last year, creating a political storm and triggering a war of words between BJP and Congress.
The BJP Government-appointed panel is headed by retired High Court Sugnya Bhatt.
"It will be a travesty if the Commission, formed and run with public money, defeats public interest," he said.
Gulail.Com and another portal Cobrapost.Com had on November 15 claimed that former Gujarat Minister of State for Home and BJP leader Amit Shah had ordered illegal surveillance of a woman at the behest of one "Saheb" in 2009.
They had released taped conversations between Shah and suspended IPS officer G L Singhal to support their claim, but said their authenticity could not be confirmed.
The Commission was set up by the Narendra Modi Government on November 26 after it came under attack over the "snoopgate" from Opposition parties and civil society groups.
The panel had asked both portals to file an affidavit by January 15 in connection with the release of tapes.
Khetan said the Bhatt Commission lacks the mandate to look into public interest concerns (like invasion of privacy) raised by the expose.
"I have seen the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Commission. I regret to say the Commission lacks the mandate to look at the most significant public interest concerns disclosed by the matter published."
The Centre has set up a separate judicial commission to inquire into "snoopgate", which has its footprints outside Gujarat, in states like Maharashtra and Karnataka.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 16 2014 | 12:25 AM IST

Next Story