Allowing petitions by the ten bar owners, Justice A V Ramakrishna Pillai made it clear that the renewal of licences should be subject to policy and judicial pronouncement of the division bench hearing the matter.
While four of the bars were included in the 418 bars whose licences were not renewed following the declaration of new excise policy of the government in March this year, six others were closed earlier.
The court found that denial of renewal of license to these bars -- one attached to four-star hotel and nine to three-star hotels-- was 'discriminatory'.
According to the petitioners, despite the recommendation by the Excise Commissioner, the authorities arbitrarily 'pick and chose' bars whose licences have to be renewed.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
