The Bombay High Court has directed the expert committee appointed by the Maharashtra government last year to continue its deliberations to find a solution to parking woes in Mumbai.
In a detailed order made public Tuesday, a bench of Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice N M Jamdar said once the committee came up with solutions, the government can implement them by taking a policy decision.
The order came on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Janhit Manch, an NGO.
The PIL demanded, among other things, a congestion tax on vehicles entering the city from outside and fixing of parking charges for vehicles parked on the road based on the 'ready reckoner rate' for properties in that area.
Earlier this week, the court had refused to grant any relief saying it could not interfere in a "policy matter".
In the detailed order, the court reiterated the stand that it can not lay down a policy.
Several orders were passed in the matter by the high court over the last few years, and officers of the government departments concerned too had been "banging their heads" to resolve the issue but they failed to come up with a viable solution, the judges observed.
A committee of experts has already been set up and it must continue to work for finding a solution, the high court said.
"We are not inclined to keep the matter on board as the reliefs prayed for are a matter of policy... the interim orders of the court show that the court is trying to grapple with a policy matter and obviously, there will be no end to it," the judges said, asking the committee to continue its meetings.
Meanwhile, a housing society in south Mumbai Wednesday withdrew a petition challenging the new parking rules of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation.
The civic body has steeply increased the fine for parking vehicles on roads outside authorised parking lots.
The fine amount now ranges from Rs 5,000 to Rs 15,000, depending on the type of vehicle.
The petition was filed by Chandralok B society and its resident Jignesh Shah. Petitioners' lawyer Vikram Trivedi Wednesday informed a division bench of justices S C Dharmadhikari and S K Shinde that they wanted to withdraw it. The court granted the request.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
