The first bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Satish K Agnihotri and Justice M M Sundersh ordered the Collector to explain as to whether more than 12 months is not enough to file reply to the notice issued by the court on the issue of removl of encroachments.
The Chamber submitted that many roads were encroached by hawkers causing great problems for public at large and sought for a direction to the authorities for removal of unauthorized encroachments.
Since then the matter was adjourned several times for want of reply from the concerned authorities which made the bench to take up the matter seriously.
The bench said when the matter came up on July 14 the court had made it clear that if the response was not filed within in a week, appropriate action would be taken against the officials concerned.
But so far no affidavit has been filed.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
