The petitioner P Kumaragurubaran alleged that G Palani and Murugan had illegally encroached on a public platform near Nagathamman temple in Vadapalani resulting in frequent traffic snarls.
The petitioner claimed no action was taken on his complaint to the civic body and sought a direction to authorities to take action.
The First Bench, comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Pushpa Satyanarayana, said "We are surprised how any construction could have been made without sanction of the corporation and as to why the corporation did not attend to the issue when the construction was on or at least when a complaint was made."
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
