HC directs Kingfisher airlines to pay over Rs 29 lakh to ex-pilot

Captain Dinesh Kant Sharma had sought, apart from the salary amount of Rs 28,95,000, 18% interest as well as gratuity of Rs 2.68 lakh

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 03 2014 | 7:05 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

Cash-strapped Kingfisher Airlines has been directed by the Delhi High Court to pay one of its former pilots over Rs 29 lakh, the amount of his outstanding salary with interest for the period from March 2012 to July 26, 2012.

Justice Manmohan Singh ordered the grounded carrier to pay Rs 28,95,000 to its former pilot, Captain Dinesh Kant Sharma, on his plea seeking payment of his salary for the notice period of five months.

The court also dismissed Kingfisher Airline's plea for "leave to defend".

Also Read

"Accordingly, the suit of the plaintiff for recovery of arrears of salary of approximately five months of Rs 28,95,000 is decreed. As far as the claim of the plaintiff (Sharma) for interest is concerned, the same is also granted at 10% per annum from the end of each month for which the salary is due till the date of payment," the court said.

Sharma, represented by advocates Jasmeet Singh and Kumud Singh, had sought, apart from the salary amount of Rs 28,95,000, 18% interest as well as gratuity of Rs 2.68 lakh.

In its defence, the grounded airline had raised various contentions including that the amount claimed is not payable as Sharma had failed to complete 70 flying hours which was mandatory for payment of monthly salary.

The court dismissed the contentions, relying upon the reasons given by another bench which had dealt with a similar plea of another former pilot of the airline.

On the issue of flying hours, the other bench had held that if there was any shortfall in flying hours, the same should have been attributed to the pilot and "without any such plea, there can be no deduction on the said account".

Justice Manmohan Singh also noted that "there is really no denial or dispute raised by the defendant (airline) to the claim of the plaintiff for recovery of arrears of his salary" to say there is no dispute for adjudication by arbitration.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 03 2014 | 6:24 PM IST

Next Story