HC dismisses actress Kajal Agarwal's plea against single-judge order on copyright of film

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jun 25 2018 | 8:45 PM IST

The Madras High Court today dismissed an appeal filed by actress Kajal Agarwal against a single-judge order of the court, declaring a coconut oil manufacturing firm as the copyright owner of a cinematograph film, in which she had acted for promoting its products.

A division bench of justices MM Sundresh and N Anand Venkatesh upheld the single-judge order, making it clear that VVD and Sons Private Limited was the first owner of the copyright.

"A person, who thus becomes the first owner of the copyright for his entire work, has been conferred with a statutory right for a period of 60 years over the cinematograph of the film. This statutory right cannot be taken away by a performer in the cinematograph film by virtue of an agreement.

"Hence, we hold that VVD is entitled to exploit the work for the entire term prescribed under section 26 of the Copyright Act and is not restricted for a period of one year by the agreement," the bench said.

As the first owner of the copyright, VVD will have the exclusive right to communicate the cinematograph film to the public "by virtue of section 14(i)(d)(iii) of the Copyright Act," the bench said and rejected the argument on behalf of Agarwal that the copyright could be enjoyed by VVD only for a period of one year by virtue of a clause in the agreement.

"To use the above proviso against VVD, there must be an agreement contrary to the effect that the parties themselves agreed that the producer will not have the copyright, in spite of producing the film," it said.

The court added that Agarwal had agreed that VVD would have the copyright over the cinematograph film and the entire promotional material.

"Therefore, there is no agreement to the contrary, taking away the copyright of VVD," the bench said, adding that it did not find any ground to interfere with the findings of the single judge.

It also rejected the argument to compensate the actress as the firm reportedly used the promotional material beyond the period of one year.

"There are absolutely no materials for this court to award compensation to Kajal Agarwal in this case...in the result, original side appeal stands dismissed," the bench said.

The court had earlier dismissed a suit filed by Agarwal, in which the actress had sought Rs 2.5 crore as damages from VVD and Sons Private Limited for allegedly misusing her profile for promoting its products, including coconut oil.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 25 2018 | 8:45 PM IST

Next Story