The Bombay High Court Monday dismissed a petition filed by a 20-year-old woman who had sought to terminate her pregnancy claiming it would have a detrimental effect on her mental health.
The petitioner, a college student, in her 24th week of pregnancy, had said that though the foetus did not have any known medical abnormalities and the state of her own mental health was not such that she could carry the pregnancy to full term and raise a child.
A bench of Justices S C Dharamadhikari and B P Colabawala, however, noted that a medical board set up in compliance with its order by the city-based JJ Group of Hospitals had said the petitioner "did not have any mental illness currently".
The court said that it had to rule within the ambit of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act which did not permit an abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy unless such pregnancy posed a risk to the lives of the foetus or the woman.
The court also took exception to the petitioner's counsel suggesting that the petitioner was probably sexually assaulted and the pregnancy was a result of such assault so she must not be forced to carry it to full term.
She said that the family had not registered a police complaint due to "fear and shame".
The court cautioned that it was imperative that in cases of sexual assault, the victim lodge a police complaint, or at least bring the same to the court's notice through the petition or initial arguments.
"Throughout these 22-23 weeks there has been no mention of sexual assault. In the absence of any specific allegation, this petition stands to be dismissed," the court said.
It added that while courts exercised their extraordinary jurisdiction in cases where victims of rape sought to terminate a pregnancy that was the result of rape, in the present case, there was no such circumstance.
The HC said that going by some previous judgements of the Supreme Court, in cases of rape, courts often considered anguish caused through rape as an injury to a woman's mental health.
However, in the present case, the petitioner had not even made a "whisper" until the day's hearing to suggest she had been raped or sexually assaulted.
"However, this explanation (of mental anguish caused due to rape) has to be specifically invoked," the bench said.
"This court is not obliged to consider something which is not pleaded in the petition," it said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
