A division bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice A V Mohta dismissed the petition filed by Right to Information activists - Krishna Rao and Sulaiman Bhimani - terming Gaikwad's appointment as "self appointment" and seeking his removal.
According to the petition, Gaikwad was part of the selection and appointment machinery and also there was conflict of interest as he, being a former government official, would hear cases pertaining to the government.
Advocate General Darius Khambata, however, opposed the petition on the ground that no rule barred a retired government servant from being posted as information commissioner.
Accepting the argument of the state government, the high court dismissed the petition.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
