In the absence of any statutory/legal right on the part of the petitioner to compel the MEA to perform legal duties, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued directing the Ministry to consider and dispose of the representation within a stipulated time frame, a bench comprising Chief Justice R K Agrawal and Justice M Sathyanarayanan held, citing Supreme Court orders.
Dismissing her petition, the bench further said the matter touched upon the foreign policy of Government of India which depended upon many factors governing the welfare and other aspects and "this court is not having expertise to analyse the same".
The petition was filed at a time when various political parties in the state have been demanding that India boycott the meet in view of alleged rights violations by Sri Lanka.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
