The court, which initially proposed to pass an interim order, later kept it on hold till tomorrow after the counsel for the airline expressed certain reservations regarding it and sought time to get instructions from his client Spicejet.
Justice Manmohan Singh, in the proposed interim order, had given suggestions to resolve the share transfer dispute between Spicejet and Maran after the airline today placed before the bench the draft resolution, passed by its board for issuing the stock warrants to Maran and KAL.
Both sides would then be asked to together move the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) for approving the resolution as an approval from the bourse was required to issue the stock warrants, the court said.
It also said it would ask BSE to consider the resolution in terms of an application made by Spicejet back in September 2014 when it was being managed by Maran and take a decision within a specified time limit.
transferred their entire 350,428,758 equity shares (58.46 per cent stake) in the airline, to Ajay Singh.
According to the deal, they were to receive the redeemable warrants in return for around Rs 679 crore that they were to give to the airline towards operating costs and debt payment, the petition has claimed.
Maran and his airline, Kal, have alleged in their plea that despite giving around Rs 579 crore to Spicejet, the carrier failed to issue them the warrants or allot them tranche 1 and 2 of Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares and the amount was not utilised for paying statutory dues due to which they were also facing prosecution.
It had also said there was no fear of transferring shares to a third party or to Maran as the shares have not yet been issued by the company.
It had further said the change of ownership was effected as a rehabilitative measure to address the liability of Rs 2,000 crore incurred by the airline while under the management of Maran.
Spicejet had also claimed that every penny has been utilised towards operations and discharge of liabilities.
In a statement, the company has said that both parties have agreed to jointly approach BSE/SEBI.
"The issuance of warrants was to be made subject to regulatory approvals and could not be issued due to non-receipt of the same," the airline has said in its statement.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
