The court, however, gave some reprieve, allowing 33 bars in four-star and heritage category hotels to function after the state government had banned bars in all hotels below five-star ranking. Twenty bars in five-star hotels were allowed to operate by the court.
The court order was a shot in the arm for the Congress-led UDF government, which has set a goal of total prohibition by 2023 through its new excise policy.
Chief Minister Oommen Chandy said the court order was a recognition of the state government's excise policy.
Rejecting the stand that the court allowing bars attached to four-star category hotels was a setback to the government, he said only around 60 bars were allowed to function now.
"This cannot be seen as partial recognition of the liquor policy," Chandy told reporters in Thiruvananthapuram,
Disposing of the 81 petitions, the court said that a claimant cannot have an expection that is impermissible.
Demand is phenomenal and displays an increase every year. Unless the reason is identified and measurers to remedy the same, it will not be possible to reduce consumption," it said.
Holding that there was no substantial difference between bars in four-star, heritage hotels and those in the five-star categories and above, the court set aside the excise policy to the extent that it excludes bars in four-star and heritage hotels for the eligiblity to be granted bar license.
Justice Mohan said the excise policy for 2014-15 was formulated on the basis of judgements of high court and the Supreme Court and report of a one-man commission and recommendation of Tax Secretary of the state.
The court also relied on the apex court verdict that state would not deny bar licences to hotels with the classification of four star and above, the judge said.
The bar owners had approached the court contending that the government's decision to close the bars was taken in 'haste' and would be counter productive as it would lose substantial revenue from Abkari (excise) business, besides impacting tourism.
The court said the bar owners can approach the division bench and seek interim orders.
The government had earlier declined to renew the licenses of 418 sub-standard bars and later decided to close down another 312 bars.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
