HC notice to govt on delegation of authority to advt body

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 08 2017 | 8:05 PM IST
The Delhi High Court has sought the Centre's response on a plea challenging the scope of power and authority exercised by the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) over advertisers and broadcasters.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar also issued notice to the Ministries of Information and Broadcasting, Consumer Affairs and AYUSH, along with the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and ASCI.
The PIL has sought a declaration from the court that the Ministries cannot delegate their legislative and judicial functions to ASCI, which is merely a self-regulatory body.
The bench sought the responses before the next date of hearing, February 21, 2018.
Petitioner Sameer Jain has stated that a "private self regulatory body or a self styled watchdog of advertising content in India has assumed the authority of a court of law and is passing binding orders of civil consequences on the basis of excessive delegation of power to it by the ministries."
The plea said that the ASCI processes complaints received against advertisements through a judicial tribunal-like body called the Consumer Complaints Council (CCC). It said the CCC comprised advertising professionals and some civil society members, but not a single technical or judicial member.
The petitioner contended that the CCC essentially acted like a judicial/quasi judicial tribunal, having trappings of a civil court and passes orders that have a bearing on the fundamental rights of citizens.
"The composition of the CCC is arbitrary and follows no principled criteria. It is essentially a group of private individuals, adjudicating questions of constitutional importance," it added.
It said that advertisers, against whom the complaints were received, were not allowed any legal representation while their fundamental rights were being adjudicated upon. "Moreover, the advertisers could not even cross-examine the complainant," the plea said.
"The procedure adopted by the ASCI to process complaints is arbitrary and in blatant violation of principles of natural justice," the petition added.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 08 2017 | 8:05 PM IST

Next Story