A bench of justices N H Patil and N W Sambre directed the state to respond to the petition and posted the matter for hearing after four weeks.
The petition was filed in September by social activist and lawyer Abha Singh. It had sought for the amendment to be declared unconstitutional and ultra vires (beyond the powers).
It also claimed that the impugned amendment created a "logical impossibility", contending that while an application of mind as regards the relevant facts was necessary for the grant of sanction, such facts could only be collected through an investigation, which followed an FIR.
The petition said the course of investigation should only be determined after the probe revealed the involvement of the public employee.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
